WebDickerson, 508 U.S. 366 (1993), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court unanimously held that, when a police officer who is conducting a lawful patdown search for weapons feels something that plainly is contraband, the object may be seized even though it is not a weapon. WebJun 7, 1993 · TIMOTHY DICKERSON on writ of certiorari to the supreme court of minnesota [June 7, 1993] Justice White delivered the opinion of the Court. On the evening of …
Minnesota v. Dickerson - Wikipedia
WebApr 19, 2000 · No. 99–5525. Argued April 19, 2000—Decided June 26, 2000. In the wake of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, in which the Court held that certain warnings must be … WebFacts: This case arises out of an automobile collision between a car owned by plaintiff Linda Joseph, driven by her son, plaintiff Andrew Joseph, and a car owned by defendant Judith … popping shower ice cream
Dickerson v. Superior Court, 40 Cal.App.5th Supp. 1 - Casetext
WebIII. Plaintiff's state law intentional tort claims and the sovereign immunity defense. Plaintiff Dickerson's petition stated three state law claims against defendant conservation officers Mertz and Batterson: abuse of process, malicious prosecution, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Each alleged claim is an intentional tort. A. WebDec 14, 2024 · Christopher G. Dickerson v. USA, No. 21-14226 (11th Cir. 2024) :: Justia Justia › US Law › Case Law › Federal Courts › Courts of Appeals › Eleventh Circuit › 2024 › Christopher G. Dickerson v. USA Receive free daily summaries of new opinions from the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Subscribe Christopher G. Dickerson v. Webdiscouraging law enforcement from carrying out warrantless searches and seizures where unnecessary. Ibid. Whenever a defendant “is charged with committing a possessory drug offense -- as in this case -- standing is automatic, unless the State can show that the property was abandoned or the accused was a trespasser.” Randolph, 228 N.J. at ... sharif mexico